Skip to content

First Drives

Nissan 370Z (2009) CAR review

By Chris Chilton

01 December 2008 02:00

Nissan's Zed car is back and that new 370Z moniker indicates a bigger 3.7-litre V6 – up from the old car's 3.5 and lifted from the Infiniti G37. Yet thanks to the extensive use of aluminium throughout, the new 370Z weighs exactly the same as the current 350Z. Time to find out if this make the new Nissan 370Z as good as a Porsche Cayman. Read on for CAR's first drive.

So the Nissan 370Z has been working out? More power, same weight and subtly different looks...

Nice of you to notice. Check out those swollen rear arches and pinched waist. The current 350Z never looked quite right – the rear end was a mess and the flanks lacked definition – but the 370Z answers almost every aesthetic criticism while still retaining the distinctive look of the Zed we’ve loved since 2003.

It’s not just cosmetic stuff either. The wheelbase is 100mm shorter than before to improve agility and the doors, bootlid and bonnet are fashioned from aluminium to peg the kerbweight at 1480kg, exactly what the old car weighed. Nissan reckoned this was needed to offset a 100kg increase resulting from meeting more stringent crash standards.

But it’s the same car underneath?

It’s the same in spirit, but the components are different. The platform is new – albeit one adapted from the old car’s – and also underpins the latest Infiniti saloons, coupes and convertibles.

The Nissan and Infinitis share the V6 engine too, which displaces 3.7 litres, up from 3.5 litres, hence the extra 20 in the name. It kicks out 331bhp, up from 309bhp and 269lb ft of torque, delivering said steeds to the limited slip-equipped rear axle via a six-speed manual gearbox or new seven-speed automatic. Other markets have had auto versions before, but this is the first time Brits have been offered a two-pedal version.

>> Click 'Next' to read more of CAR's first drive of the new Nissan 370Z

Click Thumbnails to Enlarge
Nissan 370Z (2009) CAR review

Statistics

How much? £28,000
On sale in the UK: March 2009
Engine: 3696cc 24v V6, 331bhp @ 7000rpm, 269lb ft @ 5200rpm
Transmission: Six-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Performance: 5.4sec 0-60mph, 155mph, est 28mpg, n/a g/km CO2
How heavy / made of? 1480kg/steel and aluminium
How big (length/width/height in mm)? 4250/1848
Need to know

CAR's rating

Rated 4 out of 5

Handling

Rated 4 out of 5

Performance

Rated 4 out of 5

Usability

Rated 3 out of 5

Feelgood factor

Rated 5 out of 5

Readers' rating

Rated 4 out of 5

Page

Rate this article...

Average rating: Rated 4 out of 5 (55 votes)

Discuss this

Add your comment

Nissan 370Z (2009) CAR review

Subject

Your comment

By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions

Cancel

kkirkou

reward badge

kkirkou says

RE: Nissan 370Z (2009) CAR review

Although I don't like the color, I think it looks fantastic and I declare myself a fan, which I never thought I would be for a Datsun. This car looks completely different from the previous 350Z and is very close to the current 911, only better!

05 December 2008 20:23

Robby1977

reward badge

Robby1977 says

RE: Nissan 370Z (2009) CAR review

Whilst I still love it, it is a colour sensitive design. I hate the look of it in the 'felt tip pen' colours, blue, and this colour what ever it maybe (custard? teenage spot puss?) In the original first pics you posted (grey?) I thought it looked fantastic. Oh, and still think the door handles look rubbish, like something you'd see on an American fridge freezer! Maybe I'm being picky, still a lot of car, a lot of bang for the money, and still very glad they make it.

01 December 2008 21:21

morepowerigor

reward badge

morepowerigor says

RE: Nissan 370Z (2009) CAR review

cool, and it should be tons cheaper than the Porsche...Shame none of this chutzpah has rubbed off on Renault yet.. Good that they have kept the weight the same, but it makes me wonder how badly the old version crashed if they've added 100kg to comply with current crash regs?

01 December 2008 18:44

supercarrambler

reward badge

supercarrambler says

RE: Nissan 370Z (2009) CAR review

I rather like this, but then I remember the Mini Marcus (which this has a uncanny resembalance) and the original 240/260 Z cars with fondness. Maybe Nissan should take a leaf out of many a manufacture and change their name back, Datsun just has a better ring to it

01 December 2008 15:53

Anonymous

Anonymous says

RE: Nissan 370Z (2009) CAR review

I am looking forward to driving the 370Z. The updated looks do suit the car and the cabin quality certainly adds to the overal package. I bought the orignal 350Z after test driving all of its competition. The only car that eclipsed the 350Z for smiles per mile was the Cayman S. However, that smile was reduced when you priced all the extras that are standard on the reliable Nissan. Even the 2.7 Cayman with the 350s "GT pack" worked out over £10,000 more! An american road test of the 370Z posted a sub 5 second 0-60 time. Now thats closer to a basic 911! You need to spend time in a car like the 350 (and hopefully the 370) to realise how much of a great GT car it really is; sublime feel through the steering wheel and a level of comfort that ensures you are still fresh when you arrive at your destination. For a sub £30,000 car the 370Z does look a bit of a bargain. For you arm chair critics: "you will never know until you give it a go".

01 December 2008 10:08

Become a CAR contributor

Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.

Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)